Competency or Competence? Tomato or Tomatoe? But wait! - there’s a difference!

Language in the field of performance management can be confusing. Two of our key

terms: competency and competence are particularly problematic when used casually.

While it’s generally agreed that the word competency refers to an ability, it can

reference effective performance of a specific practice task (“micro-level”) or effective

big-picture performance in general (“macro-level”). Either use is linguistically correct,

but from the point of view of performance, there’s a wealth of difference!

For clarity, we at the CSC Collaborative say that:

 The ability to effectively perform a micro-level task is a competency (plural:


 The ability to effectively perform as a professional (at the macro-level) is


Think of it this way:

 In the workplace, a “competency profile” lists a large number of micro-level

abilities (competencies) that are required for effective professional

performance: competencies enable competence.

25 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

What’s the problem with ‘Continuing Competence’?

Ensuring the ongoing competence of regulated professionals is a key focus for regulators and often an important objective of Quality Assurance programming. However, in most cases, ongoing competence i

A Scale for Mature Practice

One of the most powerful aspects of the CSC Framework and the Career-Span Competencies is their applicability to almost every profession. Application of the 14 competencies at some level is required t